If the fastest 10k is 26'49", then surely the fastes 5k would be less than 13'30". Wouldn't it? Seeing how half of 26'49" is 13'25"ish.
Posted by:charley on October 12, 2007 08:50 PM
I'm guessing the person pulled their finger out for the last 5km? Or their power song really did make a difference.
Posted by:Ashley on October 14, 2007 09:15 PM
Typically people running 5 and 10K's that fast aren't wearing iPods anyway.
Its aspirational though, and as most Nike work extremely well executed. I like it.
Posted by:Bruce on November 20, 2007 09:02 AM
Note: Comments will appear after being approved. This has been done to stop spam.
Name:
Email Address:
URL:
Remember details?
Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)
If the fastest 10k is 26'49", then surely the fastes 5k would be less than 13'30". Wouldn't it? Seeing how half of 26'49" is 13'25"ish.
Posted by:charley on October 12, 2007 08:50 PM
I'm guessing the person pulled their finger out for the last 5km? Or their power song really did make a difference.
Posted by:Ashley on October 14, 2007 09:15 PM
Typically people running 5 and 10K's that fast aren't wearing iPods anyway.
Its aspirational though, and as most Nike work extremely well executed.
I like it.
Posted by:Bruce on November 20, 2007 09:02 AM
